Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OnsideGoal.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OnsideGoal.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEB, no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the site JMHamo (talk) 20:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - entirely primary sourced article about a site that fails WP:NWEB --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of nationality. Giant Snowman 18:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails NWEB. A bit too promotional in my opinion as well. Fenix down (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.