Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online Shipping Charges

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Online Shipping Charges

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be primarily original research, non-neutral and a WP:COATRACK for the site freeshipping.org/com. I42 (talk) 18:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is another example of the site being promoted by the same editor. I42 (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Article presently reads like a copy-paste from another source. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is. Unambiguous copyvio of [1]. I've tagged it accordingly.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 18:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I made a mistake. On further checking, the first paragraph is an unambiguous copyvio, but the rest of it is not. Untagged.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 18:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely. The statistics quoted from FreeShipping.org are copy-pasted wholesale from http://www.freeshipping.org/statistics, which is footnoted as a reference. But copy-paste is hardly a ref. Therefore, Delete as copy-paste, copyvio of multiple sources. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Veiled spam. Non-notable subject. Essay. Etc. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable and promotional coatrack. Transmissionelement (talk) 15:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. all of the above--Hu12 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.