Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One point less on the sky (2016)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One point less on the sky (2016)[edit]

One point less on the sky (2016) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by COI editor, a school film project that won an award as such - does not appear to meet WP:NFILM Melcous (talk) 01:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete with no objection to recreation once the film gains more coverage. There's just not enough out there to justify inclusion and the award looks to be minor as far as Wikipedia is concerned. This isn't meant to slight the film or the award, just that Wikipedia tends to be very selective with their awards and most film festivals awards don't give even partial notability unless the festival itself is notable. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Minor film with a minor award. Does not meet NFILM. --Randykitty (talk) 06:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
actual Spanish title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 03:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm just worried that all we really have is coverage about the film screening and winning a student award, nothing really beyond that. If we had a review then that'd put me a little more at ease. I'm not opposed to this being kept though, FWIW. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 16:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete at best as I'm still not seeing enough substance for convincing. SwisterTwister talk 19:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. student awards only. DGG ( talk ) 02:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.