Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Time for All Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JForget 00:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One Time for All Time[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable album Jrtayloriv (talk) 22:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Clearly as it has received significant coverage in reliable sources it is a notable album.--Michig (talk) 08:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What significant coverage, in which reliable sources? Jrtayloriv (talk) 08:58, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For example: this, this, this, and possibly these: [1], [2].--Michig (talk) 09:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The following is from the WP Notability guidelines: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." The band has a robust page of their own that has no notability issues, so this album page is supposedly notable too. Previous contributors have added enough information to get started. However, I recommend tags to Expand and/or to add references to get this album page up to Wikip standards. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 22:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

The album is certainly notable, the band is notable, and the CD has reviews such as this one http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?albumid=10584 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 30daysinAK (talk • contribs) 05:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Michig and Doomsdayer.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.