Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One2many
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- One2many (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Sources used either barely mention or do not mention the subject at all. Sources available seem to be entirely passing mention, press releases, and official or generic unreliable websites. Likely conflict of interest/advertising. GMGtalk 13:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 14:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 14:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The majority of references appear to consist of press releases and sales announcements, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 16:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.