Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the Spot (pricing game)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- On the Spot (pricing game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced original research on a pricing game. Precedent for deletion started with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Any Number et al. No sources forthcoming. Last bundled in AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check Game which closed as no consensus with no prejudice against renomination. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm no fan of pricing games, but there seems to be at least one book on "The prize is right" and probably more. This is certainly not highly scientific, but neither is the topic. This would mean that it is possible to source the article to some extent, it has just not been done within the last 5 years. However, this seems to make it a weak keep. PanchoS (talk) 05:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The fact that it's not been done in five years isn't enough evidence that ain't nobody gonna fix it? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 05:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to List of The Price Is Right pricing games#Retired games. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Google search contains links only to fansites, font pages and unrelated results. Topic is not notable, not significantly covered outside of Wiki and no sources are included in the article. Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability. Sottolacqua (talk) 21:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.