Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On Wah Chang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On Wah Chang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fiji-based Chinese trading family that claims some significance but I cannot find any substantial coverage in either GNews, GBooks, GScholar or other freely accessible sources that exceeds a brief mention. Even the source mentioned in the article (Chinese in Fiji) only mentions it in passing. Most other sources are either about Wah Chang or the Wah Chang Corporation, two different subjects. Fails WP:CORP. Regards So Why 08:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. So Why 08:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. So Why 08:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and a pretty huge WP:V fail. As of right now this article is effectively unreferenced. Unless some solid RS citations are added it needs to go. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.