Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On My Own (Miley Cyrus song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On My Own (Miley Cyrus song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An example of WP:CFORKfail and again another song article which fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. There is absolutely no independent third party coverage except minor mentions in album reviews and those taken from the album's own liner notes. Minor chart placement and most of the song details being taken from the album liner notes. The first para actually is in no way related to the article at all. This should be deleted or best, redirected to parent album, Bangerz for a plausible search term. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 20:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Unambiguously fanpov, unambiguously promotional. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:30, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Passing mentions in album reviews do not confer notability. I also share concerns about the non-neutral coverage. J Milburn (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.