Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omer Nadeem (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDED due to previous AfD The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
Omer Nadeem[edit]
- Omer Nadeem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article fails WP:N and WP:BIO because the subject hasn't received significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. There are a lot of hits on a standard google search but most are junk; blog postings, photo and audio sites, and other nonreliable sources of information. There are only two hits on google news, both recent and none that are satisfactory. Much of the content is forward-looking in a manner which violates WP:CRYSTAL; focusing on who he is becoming rather than who he is currently. ThemFromSpace 07:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've removed some chunks of copyrighted material, and I notice that this article has a history of recreation after deletion. I would recommend applying salt this time. ThemFromSpace 08:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've requested speedy deletion under Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G4 as it looks like nothing has changed since the last AfD. I agree that it should be salted too. Smartse (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.