Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olongapo News

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olongapo News

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable family newsletter failing WP:NOTABILITY. Created and Maintained by WP:SPA WP:COI accounts. They dont even have a "real" website, instead they are using Wikipedia as their "official Website page" see Basic Information in this section-> website. Wikipedia is NOT a vehicle for Advertising Hu12 (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions 15:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NOTWEBHOST. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 16:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Wikipedia is not a web host. Spam. SL93 (talk) 23:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Wikipedia cannot be used for web hosting or as a vehicle to promote a non-notable newsletter. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Patent nonsense subject. Keb25 (talk) 13:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ditto. --B music ian 08:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.