Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olof Mörck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor 11:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Olof Mörck[edit]

Olof Mörck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating per a discussion in #wikipedia-en-help on IRC.

Subject may not meet WP:NOTABILITY guidelines, WP:RS may apply.

Also nominating Elize Ryd for the same reasons. -- Cheers, Alfie. (Say Hi!) 18:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete, as per my comments on IRC. Lack of reliable sources to demonstate the subject's notability outside of their band Amaranthe -- Cheers, Alfie. (Say Hi!) 18:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC) (@Alfiepates: Struck !vote, nom does not get an additional !vote. Sam Sailor 11:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or redirect - Keep as a member of multiple notable bands, or redirect to Amaranthe (or other suitable target). --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - due to #6 at WP:SINGER; it is notable that he is in multiple notable bands. But the article needs expansion, so I say KEEP the article but then add an edit tag at the top calling for more sources and see if anyone comes up with more evidence of his independent notability. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    To be honest, I don't see him being a prominent member of those bands. Which is required for #6 to be relevant. Yes, he was in them, but it wasn't like he was the lead in any of them. There is minimal sources that discuss him individually. Always the bands. Not him. There is nothing to write about besides him being in the bands. What are you going to write? That he was a member in the bands? That isn't enough for a standalone article. --Majora (talk) 21:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A minor difference of opinion. Instead of deleting now, I am merely in favor of giving the community some more time to come up with additional sources, perhaps from other languages. AfDs could serve as a push to the community. I would have no dispute if the vote on this page ended otherwise. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Your welcome | Democratics Talk 07:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.