Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivier Kamanda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olivier Kamanda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO -- lack of significant third-party coverage of him, most notable event seems to be founding a redlinked magazine, and unclear if association with Clinton is significant. Possible to rescue if anyone can dig up sources. BennyHillbilly (talk) 04:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not seem to be notable at this time based on available sources. And working for someone who is notable does not confer notability, so... -- BenTels (talk) 18:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Recently edited, found more third-party coverage. AuthorAuthor (talk) 07:08, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per AuthorAuthor's new contribution to the article. hajat vrc @ 07:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.