Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep -- the nomination did not offer a valid reason for deletion. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 15:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Olivia (TV series)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not important, not popular. There are more important things that don't even have an article! VegetaSaiyan 23:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Keep: The show has won a Parents' Choice Award [1], which is pretty notable in itself. . As far as it not being "important", that's sort of a term that's up for debate. What is important to you or I might be pretty important to others (especially those with kids), so it's sort of subjective. It's also a pretty popular series, although popularity or the lack thereof doesn't automatically qualify or disqualify something as far as articles go. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Keep and improve the article. Whether something is important or popular is not relevant to its notability per Wikipedia's definition of the term. What matters most is coverage in reliable sources, and Google News is turning up enough articles to indicate notability. [2][3][4][5] Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep This fully meets WP:GNG, is well cited, and it is of very much popularity, as mentioned above it won the Parents' Choice Award. Also "Not popular" is not a reason to delete. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 03:29, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per others' arguments presented here and the fact that no part of the nominator's rationale is a valid reason for deletion under the deletion policy. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 04:11, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Nomination statement does not reflect the intent of the deletion policy →Σ τ c. 06:36, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with Tokyogirl179 and the rest. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a popularity contest. PolicarpioM (talk) 07:32, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. If more important topics don't have articles yet, feel free to create them. Reach Out to the Truth 15:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball Keep: Perhaps the nominator could turn his energies to creating articles he thinks ought to be created, between boning up on the requirements of WP:Deletion policy. Ravenswing 15:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - valid reason has not been given for deletion. 11coolguy12 (talk) 06:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.