Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olin/Winchester Salvo Rifle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Olin/Winchester Salvo Rifle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable firearm; no reliable sources found. Possibly redirect to Special Purpose Individual Weapon (SPIW), where Project SALVO redirects, but that article seems to cover both a program and an individual prototype which was the result of the program. ansh666 09:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh666 09:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh666 09:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ansh666 09:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines.--RAF910 (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only applied source is self published. While verifiable, not sufficiently covered in found reliable sources to meet GNG. Might be some offline stuff. BusterD (talk) 17:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.