Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga T. Weber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Olga T. Weber[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See Wikipedia is not a memorial. This article reads like an obituary. It fails to establish biographical notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 11:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How does it fail to establish notability? I have cited sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConstitutionTown (talk • contribs) 17:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I rewrote the article including rewriting the lede to show her notability. I also added additional references. She is the creator of the United States Constitution Day and the reason that Louisville, Ohio celebrates it annually and is called "Constitution Town." Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it is clearly the problem is with how the article was originally written and we do WP:AGF since the editor is even new user. But this obviously passes WP:GNG, and now improved by Megalibrarygirl, thus passing the standard –Ammarpad (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Constitution Day (United States). The subject is completely devoid of notability other than her proposal and advocacy of Constitution Day. She merits a mention, but not a detailed biography. This is classic WP:ONEEVENT. TJRC (talk) 21:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- meets GNG and per recent article improvements (thanks Megalibrarygirl!). K.e.coffman (talk) 04:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG after good improvement by Megalibrarygirl.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.