Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleg Fisunenko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Procedural keep as no reason for deletion offered and no deletion !votes. No prejudice against a nomination if reasons are identified. StarM 02:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oleg Fisunenko[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N Львівське (говорити) 03:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - The nomination simply points to the entire notability guideline page, without delineating why the article should be removed from Wikipedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Keep - No rationale for deletion provided. Carrite (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep As per WP:SK#1 there is no argument for deletion. AfD should be closed within 24 hours WP:NPASR so that nominator can decide whether or not to do the work needed to prepare the community for a discussion. See also WP:ATD and WP:BEFORE. Unscintillating (talk) 05:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. The nominator has nominated for deletion (both PROD and AfD) a number of articles created by user:Orekhova with whom he/she has a content dispute over Rinat Akhmetov article (see here and here. I am not taking sides in this dispute but it seems that these nominations are trigged by the dispute and not by the actual lack of notability of these articles. I thank that this is a violation of the meaning of the AfD procedure. Beagel (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note Admin request has been made on the talk page to close this AfD. Unscintillating (talk) 18:04, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.