Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ole Söderberg (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Userfying article Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 19:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ole Söderberg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have recreated the article with plenty of sources (unlike the earlier deleted versions which were very poorly sourced). It seems clear to me that the coverage is both substantial and reliable and that the article thus passes WP:GNG, but considering the earlier AfDs I thought another discussion might be warranted. WP:ATHLETE does not apply when the WP:GNG is met. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not satisfy WP:NSOCCER, and sources are not of sufficient quality to satisfy WP:GNG. The independent reliable sources only have trivial coverage. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 10:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above - sources only give passing mention and therefore, as he has not played a pro-game yet he is non-notable. On the plus side, give it time and he will probable play. They usually do and when he does, recreate.--Egghead06 (talk) 08:21, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete has not played a game in a fully professional competition, and only one of the refs really mentions the player in much more than a passing mention, failing WP:GNG. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 08:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - still fails WP:GNG! If/when this is deleted can an admin please salt the page and stop all this nonsense! Giant Snowman 10:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt - Without any first team caps for Newcastle, he clearly fails WP:ATHLETE, and there is no indication he passes WP:GNG either. Given that it's been deleted and recreated three times already, most recently just over a month ago, I recommend the page be creation protected. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.