Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oldest Active Baltimore Catholic Parish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as notable, but rename to St. Vincent de Paul Church. Bearian (talk) 19:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oldest Active Baltimore Catholic Parish[edit]

No evidence that the church is notable, and in any case, this is Wikipedia, not the Guinness Book of Records. If the church is notable, then the page should be about the church, with the fact that it is the oldest being part of that article. Mayalld (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The church does some really good works for the community, but truthfully it's not notable in Baltimore, let alone for Wikipedia. Wildthing61476 (talk) 15:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rename. The appropriate name would be St. Vincent de Paul (church in Baltimore). --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 15:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If kept, the article should indeed move to a new title, such as Church of St. Vincent de Paul (Baltimore). The church may well be notable, but right now I have no opinion. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep and Rename Its an foolish title, but some of the content in the article could be used to identify the church, location etc. The article would need substantial work. scope_creep (talk) 17:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rename and keep. I cleaned it up some. If it is really as important as it says, some categories should allow other editors to find it and add constructively. —Scouter Sig 22:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rename - suggest St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, Baltimore. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re-Write and Rename- This is not Guinness Book. The history of the church is notable, the fact they deliver hot meals is not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconoclast.horizon (talk • contribs) 00:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletions. —Peterkingiron (talk) 23:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be advertising for the parish. Needs a re-write but contains information that may still be validSpiorad (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely notable per this. I'm going to be bold and just rename it, keep or delete as there is consensus for that. • Lawrence Cohen 22:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.