Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Atheists
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Oklahoma Atheists[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oklahoma Atheists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this organisation has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the organization. Some limited trivial mentions are floating around, but nothing significant. There is one brief mention in an old newspaper, but only a sentence not addressing the subject in depth and detail. This organisation hence does not meet notability criteria set out in NCORP/NORG. MaxnaCarta (talk) 01:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MaxnaCarta (talk) 01:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No sources found, even what's given in the article isn't much for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Atheism and Oklahoma. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 05:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not appear to meet GNG. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 06:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Does not pass WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. You play to win the game (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.