Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh, the Guilt (Grey's Anatomy)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Black Kite (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the Guilt (Grey's Anatomy)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let the Angels Commit:"Tagged as failing WP:GNG. Does not seem notable outside of being an episode of Grey's Anatomy."Curb Chain (talk) 01:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of wp:notability of/for a separate episode like this. Zero references. Looks like part of mass-production of articles on individual episodes with some material duplicated across articles. North8000 (talk) 03:59, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, episode features an Emmy-nominated performance, which should be easy enough to source. bd2412 T 21:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep though the detail needs to be greatly condensed--even more than some of the other too-expansive articles. As with another nomination above, the failure to notice the Emmy proves recklessness in nomination and a decision to delete without thinking, in defiance of policy. The entire group of AfDs should be rejected as the work of a person deciding to imitate a bot. Whether further action should be taken I leave to others, but if I were the nom, the shame of my inadequate work being demonstrated in this fashion would be sufficient. DGG ( talk ) 05:07, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the emmy nomination was selfnominated, I don't think that would pass GNG.Curb Chain (talk) 07:04, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Compare Eric McCormack's win of his emmy nomination for Lows in the Mid-Eighties, yet the article is not notable. I don't see how a emmy nomination makes an episode notable.Curb Chain (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you mention the emmy nomination in your AfD nomination? The nomination simply says "Same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let the Angels Commit:"Tagged as failing WP:GNG. Does not seem notable outside of being an episode of Grey's Anatomy." That prior Afd garnered one vote in two weeks of being listed, its hardly a precedent of note.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I still think the same problems are there. Once again, I do not think an Emmy nomination makes something notable, especially consider the nominee chooses the episode for his/her consideration for winning.Curb Chain (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Except that being nominated for a major award marks the episode as being particularly special. And that the nomination provides something additional to write about in the article. And it gets covered by reliable sources. Rlendog (talk) 20:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - (But condense article a bit.) I think the Emmy nomination for the episode is evidence of some notability.--Stv Fetterly (Edits) 17:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Numerous Grey's Anatomy episodes have been serially nominated. More general discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If Tomorrow Never Comes (Grey's Anatomy).--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Even if there are questions about the notability of some of the many nominated episodes, the Emmy nomination clinches this one as a keep for me. Rlendog (talk) 20:45, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also some coverage here. Rlendog (talk) 02:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Grey's Anatomy (season 3). Nothing about this particular episode is individually notable. See also my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If Tomorrow Never Comes (Grey's Anatomy). Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 23:45, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I would think that an Emmy nomination is individually notable, or at least some evidence in that direction. Rlendog (talk) 02:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.