Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogress (comics) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Hulk supporting characters. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ogress (comics)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article still fails to establish notability 11 years after the last AfD resulted in redirect. TTN (talk) 03:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 03:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 03:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restore merge to List of Hulk supporting characters. BOZ (talk) 03:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to List of Hulk supporting characters. — Hunter Kahn 04:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Hulk supporting characters, this article is sourced entirely to primary sources and as such fails GNG. A basic character biography already exists at that page, and as such there is nothing to merge as this is all in-universe information. Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There was a consensus to redirect this article back when it was nominated in 2008. Why on Earth does it still exist? Unless something has changed, I think this is an obvious Snowball redirect. Dark Knight 2149 10:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Restore Redirect - The prior AFD was pretty clear, and though it was 12 years ago, the notability and reliable sourcing of the character has not really increased. As the merge was already performed in the past, and there is no additional sourced information that has been added since, an additional merge now is not needed. Rorshacma (talk) 14:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.