Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogasawara Ujioki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 17:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ogasawara Ujioki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Historical people. A review of Nihon jinmei daijiten here is unhelpful. A quick search of Google books shows no support. The stub article does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Ansei (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Ansei (talk) 17:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Ansei (talk) 17:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He betrayed his lord Imagawa Ujizane for Tokugawa Ieyasu and then died bedridden. Not a candidate for independent article per WP:N. These Medieval Japanese articles generally do not benefit from searches in Google Books. They generally require printed primary language sources, but even then they usually do not provide enough material for separate biographical articles. Jun Kayama 00:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is one of the many unreferenced stubs created by User:Exiled Ambition before he was blocked. It should never have been made into its own article without the proper sourcing. Even the Japanese-language version is an unreferenced stub. Chris Troutman (talk)
Delete. Bueller 007 (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.