Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office of Frontier Security
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Solarian League. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Office of Frontier Security (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:NOTE minor component of fictional work; no demonstrated third-party notability. John Nagle (talk) 16:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Solarian League. Apathetic as to whether underlying content is deleted. I previously redirected and expanded the Solarian League blurb about this group; i.e. there is no content that requires merging. --EEMIV (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — non-notable, unsourced, trivial. see also. Cheers, Jack Merridew 16:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no references, minor component of fictional work. Only references in Google are to fan sites, Wikipedia copies, and dictionary sites. This stuff belongs on a fan wiki. --John Nagle (talk) 16:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Honorverse or Solarian League. Ikip (talk) 17:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete entirely unourced and unsourcable essay on a fictional organization that serves as a plot element in sci-fi books. Inasmuch as its a significant plot element, it's already more than sufficiently covered in the wikipedia articles on the books themselves. This is just another trivial plot summary content fork with lots of fansite speculation thrown in. There are many fansites on the interwebs. Wikipedia should not be one of them.Bali ultimate (talk) 17:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and transwiki. Merge a summary to Solarian League, transwikify the rest to Honorverse wiki per my comments on the talk page of the article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as Pietrus suggests. There is no good reason for omitting major plot elements of major series entirely., DGG (talk) 22:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to whatever book it first appeared in or to the list of organizations in said universe, merge only verifiable content.- Mgm|(talk) 09:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Solarian League. Debresser (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge proposed and ready to carry out. Debresser (talk) 10:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- See: Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#You may edit the article during the discussion especially:
You should exercise extreme caution before merging any part of the article. If you are bold but the community ultimately decides to delete the content, all your mergers must be undone. (This is necessary in order to remain compliant with the requirements of GFDL). It is far better to wait until the discussion period is complete unless there is a strong case for merge under the deletion policy. This is not an issue, however, if the merged content is not merely copied and pasted, but instead completely rewritten so that only uncopyrightable facts are transferred, not copyrightable expression.
Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- See: Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#You may edit the article during the discussion especially:
- Merge proposed and ready to carry out. Debresser (talk) 10:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the list of organizations. 70.29.213.241 (talk) 14:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with John Nagle above - more nn in-universe content. Eusebeus (talk) 17:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.