Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oddworld: Abe (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oddworld: Abe[edit]

I renominate this article because I think the last time people didn't understand my reasoning, so now i will quote Abraham Lure from the last AfD: "The two games are not two parts of the same story. Having an article that describes these two games and only these two games is equal to having an article which describes Star Wars Episode IV, and Star Wars Episode V - and nothing else. It is not logical. The two games are not a duology. The article is extremely factually inaccurate, not least in describing the two games as as a duology, when they are absolutely not, and I can't help but think that some things are there are jokes. For example, "Oddworld: Abe; or, The Destiny of the Mudokons (often referred to as Oddworld: Abe by fans or abbrieviated to OAOTDOTM, OATDOTM, OATDTM, The Mudokons or simply Abe)" - as a fan of Oddworld for nearly 10 years, I can guarantee that there is absolutely nothing even slightly factual about what I just quoted. It's all wrong-wrong-wrong. To be honest, the reasons people have put for keeping the article show a vital misunderstanding of the situation - I hope I've helped." Mika1h 11:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Mika1h 11:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I agree with the reasoning in the nomination. JIP | Talk 13:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Wickethewok 19:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominator. Combination 21:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - What else can you say really? Mika1h makes it very clear. The Kinslayer 12:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons as before, which Mika1h has kindly quoted.—Abraham Lure 14:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 18:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above Jay32183 23:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - exactly per my reason in the original nom. - Hahnch e n 05:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. --Alan Au 19:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.