Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octoshape

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete without prejudice per WP:TNT. While everybody's saying "delete", everybody is also suggesting that a better article can be written so if somebody does so it won't be subject to CSD G4. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:31, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Octoshape[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability disputed. User:Skrewler removed a large amount of text on the article deemed to be 'blatant POV, marketing speak, advertising, inaccuracies, nonsense' which also left the article unsourced (I find the sources listed in the article version before Skrewler's clean-up primary/unreliable. Delete. J u n k c o p s (want to talk?|my log) 18:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While Skewler was harsh, this could be better sourced. Leaning to deletion. Bearian (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skewler is/was an alleged sock of User:Paul gene/User:The Sceptical Chymist, but there seems to be no consensus on blocks (the CheckUser results in a code-letter F). J u n k c o p s (want to talk?|my log) 17:14, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The user making those claims was paranoid, the claims were investigated and I was cleared. Whats the point of bringing that up? Skrewler (talk) 22:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete However, I would love to see a properly sourced and unbiased article rather than being deleted. Skrewler (talk) 22:32, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.