Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/October 2006 in video gaming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 2006 in video gaming. Bishonen | talk 04:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2006 in video gaming

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not even sure how it would be possible to show this was notable. Just a blog entry, surely.. WP:NOTBLOG JMWt (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into 2006 in video gaming. South Nashua (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unnecessarily narrow time period to discuss for the topic. Reliable sources do not discuss the industry by month and it doesn't look like this particular month was given any lasting attention. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not even close to notable; nothing more than a fork. We already have a 2016 list. Bearian (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Reach Out to the Truth 18:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete though as noted, there might be a few useful things to make sure are in the 2006 in video gaming article, and if so , this should be merged there. --MASEM (t) 18:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with above reasoning. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:50, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unnecessarily specific in scope and redundant to the respective year article. Sergecross73 msg me 17:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete - if anything isn't already in the 2006 article, it can be moved there. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.