Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupational exposure to Lyme disease

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Occupational exposure to Lyme disease

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Offshoot of Lyme disease that adds nothing substantial and has no reason to be a standalone article. Mooonswimmer 01:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as I see, references at the article, or at the article for Lyme disease, are about Lyme disease, not about occupation exposure. GNC requires sources addressing the topic directly. Cinadon36 10:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems redundant, and these offshoot articles tend to get neglected. ScienceFlyer (talk) 03:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.