Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Observable (Computing)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Reactive extensions#Observables and Observers. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Observable (Computing)[edit]

Observable (Computing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is nothing more than covert artspam for reactivex and is specific only to this, basically a neologism and rife with WP:OR. Praxidicae (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Merge into Reactive extensions; if "An observable is one of the key components of reactive programming", Reactive programming should include it. -- Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated (talk) 03:53, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If kept as a redirect, the page will need to be renamed to Observable (computing) per WP:PARENDIS. Narky Blert (talk) 09:50, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm I'm happy with that rename. It's also just possible this is WP:TOOSOON Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.