Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oasis Animation (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oasis Animation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Have some credible work but it is not passing WP:NCORP MickeyMouse143 (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and Canada. MickeyMouse143 (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Companies. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:48, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notable animation studio, notable through their work as there is no other way that an animation studio can be notable other than through their work. If we were to insist on WP:SIGCOV then we'd only have articles on animation studios where someone got murdered, or some other scandal happened that made them appear in the news.--PiccklePiclePikel (talk) 16:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — WP:NCORP is the strictiest SNG out there: no WP:42 = no notability. A company cannot be notable based on its work, that's just, no. ~Styyx^Talk? 16:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Current references are not sufficient to estabilish notability (fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.