Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OS.js

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:08, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OS.js

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software - no references found in reliable sources. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Web operating system: it seems to make sense to collect the software of a kind there (as well as Pyro Desktop, see AfD discussion). Note: I was the one to decline the PROD with the similar concern expressed in edit summary. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Web operating system shouldn't be used a dumping ground for listing all kinds of non-notable examples. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems like a clearer delete than the Pyro Desktop one I nominated (and is linked above). I simply don't see the notability here. Shadowjams (talk) 14:30, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Couldnt find any reason why subject is notable. Per AndrewWTaylor, I'm inclined to suggest that long lists of non-notable examples is unencyclopedic. The other problem is what are the inclusion criteria for these lists? If there are barely any sources that we can use to justify a stand-alone article, as in the present case, how can we assess the subject for inclusion in a list? Pit-yacker (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no coverage in reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 23:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – After some searching, not finding coverage in reliable sources. There are directory and blog listings and commentary, such as this blog, but not finding coverage to qualify this topic's notability. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Pyro Desktop AfD discussion outcome and WP:SNOW. As I was the only supported of this article, this discussion can be closed right now. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.