Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMY
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete per G3. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OMY[edit]
- OMY (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unlikely to be notable (cannot find anything proving notability as claimed, and no references provided). This was not CSD'd as A7 because it "claims" notability, thus doesn't quite fit the A7 criteria. ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 19:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Expanded rationale on article's talk page. ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 19:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete A7 This seems to me to be a pretty clear-cut CSD candidate, and I have tagged the article as such. To avoid falling into that category it should make "any credible claim of significance or importance", and none is present there. It is also an unreferenced BLP of a minor. RichardOSmith (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.