Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OK model
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, practically patent nonsense. Relisting would be pointless. Sandstein 23:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK model[edit]
- OK model (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A previous, very similar version of this was deleted as "incoherent". It is very difficult to understand, has no real supporting references and no evidence of notability. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The original author of the article appears to be the same as the author of the only real reference. No real google hits on "observing knowledge model", "ok model" is all irrelevent. Seems to be some sort of research that has no coverage in secondary sources. --Tombomp (talk/contribs) 09:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.