Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O'Loughin's Restaurant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 00:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O'Loughin's Restaurant

Non-Notable restaurant. No claim to notability, Google search revealed that article creator spelled the restaurant name wrong. Wrong spelling gets 18 hits, correct spelling gets 99 hits. VegaDark 00:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Couldn't this have been speedied? TheRingess 00:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wish it could have been. However, article 7 only allows for people with no claim to notability to be speedied, not places. VegaDark 00:32, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A7 has been expanded to cover groups and bands. PJM 02:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That still does not cover locations, such as this.VegaDark 04:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't implying that A7 covered establishments. I was only pointing out that it had been expanded to cover more than people, i.e. biograhpical articles. PJM 06:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, with extreme prejudice. Unfortunately, CSD only covers non-notable people. Alr 00:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As well as groups and bands. PJM 02:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pn! - FrancisTyers 01:20, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. PJM 02:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP is not a directory.--FloNight 04:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nominator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
XFD, you guys are debating the qualifications of CSD7...yeah, let's delete this. - CorbinSimpson 10:22, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see a debate. The expansion of A7 is very recent and there are editors who haven't discovered that yet. I just added information to previously made statements, despite the fact that A7 irrelevant here otherwise. PJM 16:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-02 10:32Z
Delete Per nom. I must note that I'm partly prejudiced by the use of the word folks. Argh. Dan 18:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Ajwebb 22:31, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Looks like vanity. --Terence Ong ^Talk 14:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.