Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O'Hara's Playboys

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 20:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

O'Hara's Playboys[edit]

O'Hara's Playboys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This band fails WP:NBAND - no hits, no awards, no national tours, no notable band members. Please do not remove this nomination or I will bring the matter to an administrator. Rogermx (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thank you for correcting me on the TV appearances. I did not not see this recent addition to the article.Rogermx (talk) 12:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep: On noticing this AfD, I recalled this band from a childhood misspent listening to Radio One (and given their origin, possibly previously on the pirate Radio Scotland). Name familiarity is not notability, of course. Looking for more sources, I can see forums mentioning a serious vehicle crash in Germany in 1962 and their later residence in Sheffield, but not coverage in the reliable sources needed to permit addition to the article under WP:BLP. However, I think the combination of singles and LPs on major labels of the time (Decca, Fontana) and the band's appearances on major TV programmes in both Germany and the UK are enough to make this reasonable for encyclopaedic inclusion. AllyD (talk) 08:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.