Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O'Brien's Road

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

O'Brien's Road[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article, about a non-notable road, WP:GNG not demonstrated. Meartig (talk) 22:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Although nothing in the current article is notable, there is a case for an article that discusses the history of attempts to build an adequate road connecting Sydney and Wollongong, which is still not resolved after 200 years.--Grahame (talk) 02:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my google search did not find and thing to meet WP:GNG there are no claims in the article that would suggest it is notable. Being an old road is not notable. Jeepday (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Couldn't find sources to show evidence of notability. Suonii180 (talk) 21:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn’t seem to be notable at all. Honestly I never understood why we have pages for things like random roads and random towns, some of which are only one sentence. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.