Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nvision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nvision[edit]

Spam for a non-notable (or not-yet-notable) event which relies solely on primary sources, providing nothing but forward looking speculation based on said sources. Crystal ball gazing and nothing more. --Carlos Herradura 06:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep: seems notable and established, even if in the future. Still needs cleanup, though. -- Saaga (talk) 07:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:Crystal, non-notable, no reliable 3rd party sources. Lots of ghits for "Nvision" but, the ones I saw were about companies or software and not about this event. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, as well as having no independent sources. ZappyGun (talk to me)What I've done for Wikipedia 14:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Doesn't seem to be very notable. --EclipseSSD (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep // Gargaj (talk) 13:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment AfD is a discussion, not a vote, please explain your opinion with at least a word or two. ZappyGun (talk to me)What I've done for Wikipedia 02:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: spam. ENeville (talk) 04:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not notable as there is no coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Please see the wikipedia general notability guideline. Also violates WP:CRYSTAL. People should re-add this article once its notability can be established. Randomran (talk) 16:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:CRYSTAL; of course the article can be created if the Guinness World Record is achieved and/or it receives substantial press attention. Marasmusine (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.