Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuvision Entertainment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:58, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nuvision Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:CORP with only one source currently on the article which is just another Wiki. Furthermore the original author has just blank copied from that Wiki (I cannot find the exact copyright details for the site and therefore presume it is copyrighted). Finally I can't see this company ever being notable given it was short lived and produced only a few poorly received games. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 19:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I fixed the "copying" of the website, but I hadn't actually copied from the website. Furthermore, Bimini Run, while not becoming a major hit of a game, was sold in a fair quantity around the world. I have studied early games for years, and I know what I am talking about. I have found multiple references to this company and the games that they produced/were producing. It may not be a hard-hitting Wikipedia page, but I think it still deserves to be existent.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.