Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuur Muhammad Bhutia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nuur Muhammad Bhutia[edit]

Nuur Muhammad Bhutia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not stated, references include Facebook links. Laber□T 15:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per nominator - no indication of notability.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No indication of notability and no significant independent coverage.Mdtemp (talk) 08:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Notability not stated, Facebook link goes to a MMA class taught out of a garage, website link is the gym's own website. 122.163.71.171 (talk) 18:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. In fairness to the article's creator, I note that the Facebook source also shows the cover of the subject's book Taponomics. But although the book is discussed in the article, I don't see it as notable in itself and so I don't see how the author can inherit any notability from it. Also, the good folks at the Mixed Martial Arts project have a notability guide (WP:MMANOT), and the subject doesn't come close to meeting those guidelines. NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • SNOW Delete as none of this suggests better notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.