Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutticha Namwong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 09:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nutticha Namwong[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-Notable Youtuber. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete of course, and I am sorry to bring this up, but I have competency concerns about the creator, บุญพฤทธิ์ ทวนทัย. His/her English is nearly incomprehensible and these articles create work for copyeditors who need to translate them into proper English. This is a burden on our system for diminishing returns. Machine translation is superior to this user's output. Elizium23 (talk) 04:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. [1] is a WP:INTERVIEW. So is [2]. And [3]. [4] is not. She may be notable as a media celebrity, but the sources right now seem on the wrong side of borderline. Ping me if there are more sources or analysis. What is needed is the review or reliability of those sources. Are any of thsose major Thai newspapers or portals? Is her coverage mainstream or niche? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. 1 is Thai Rath, Thailand number one newspaper. No. 3 (Sanook.com) and 4 are reputable online news site and among the first websites in Thailand. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per references above. And also this [5] (former satellite TV and free TV news station, now only online news) says that she is the first Thai youtuber to reach 10M subscriber. Here is some Thai youtube ranking I can find [6] which rank her at number 6 (number 1-5 are TV channels or music companies) --Lerdsuwa (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, I threw text from both sources into Google Translate, and while source 5 looks reliable, I am iffy on the status of source 4, which looks very gossip-magaziney. However, I will take Lerdsuwa at their word that 4 is a reliable source. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I had expected there to be more English-language coverage following her channel being featured in last year's YouTube Rewind,[7] but it's mostly passing mentions. She's featured in this Bangkok Post article[8] (which misspelled her name) and mentioned in The Thaiger[9]. The dearth of English sources notwithstanding, the amount of Thai news coverage easily establishes her notability per the GNG. The competency concerns are shared by me, but that is best addressed at a different venue. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:44, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.