Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Bobet 22:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Minor local phenomenon, if it exists at all MPF 21:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.UberCryxic 23:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN. Arbusto 02:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is a real, albeit currently local, drug being used. I am working on citations for it currently. Not sure why info on a new methamphetamine derivative would not be appropriate for Wikipedia. Bwikified 20:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Of user's 10 edits, 7 are to the article in question. William Pietri 16:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable if local. Uncited text should be removed from article before going to an AfD. JASpencer 10:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A search on Erowid.org yields nothing related to a drug called "nutt." Donbert 04:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It'll never get on erowid if this information is suppressed. No reason to delete this. Texaspete 11:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- User's fourth edit. William Pietri 16:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It should be on a site like Erowid before it gets onto Wikipedia. This article seems to only contain original research. I checked out the references and couldn't find anything relevant to nutt. Though to be fair, this was as far as I got with the last reference. I couldn't seem to find the article it mentions. Donbert 06:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find anything to verify this. The NEJM reference, which seems to be the only cite, does not appear in their search results for "nutt" and the article title does not appear in Google, unlike a randomly selected article, which has plenty of mentions on the web. Similarly, I can't find anything on Google for the cited author. And searching on Google for "nutt methamphetamine nutmeg" yields nothing related in the first 10 pages of results. There's nothing on Google News for either "nutt nutmeg" or "nutt methamphetamine". I'll apologize profusely if I'm wrong, but this looks like a hoax to me. William Pietri 16:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It LOOKS like a good article at the outset, but at BEST the artcle should be merged with Methaphetamines. It reads more like a neologism than a new topic. The recipe described is a simple crystal meth recipe, with a few trivial additions (like the nutmeg??? So your meth tastes like Egg Nogg? Is this Christmas Meth?). I checked the only web reference, and it is just a general reference for Methamphetamines. IF the article is notable, the term would show up elsewhere. --Jayron32 02:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Has anyone got access to the citations. Do any of them mention Nutt? If they don't I'll withdraw my keep vote. JASpencer 22:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 22:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.