Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nursie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. kur ykh 05:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nursie[edit]

Non-notable character, hardly warrants her own article - suggest that if not deletion, merge with List of minor Blackadder characters ≈ The Haunted Angel 23:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep/Comment It's awfully well-written, well-sourced, and well-formatted for what some consider a "minor" character. BMW(drive) 23:28, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is see 'no sources at all. Did i miss something? Not even a ref/notes section.Yobmod (talk) 08:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep also--it is very well-written, and while there seem to be no books or articles published on Nursie, she is quoted all over the internet, and rightly so. Drmies (talk) 00:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per above. A little too major to be a "minor character", if I had to rank them I'd say she was probably about fifth ranked in Blackadder II. Well written, too. Grutness...wha? 00:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge per nom. Well written, and a hilarious character from a great series. And non-notable and unverified. The article is mostly a series of quotes, with nothing to show she has any real world notability. WP:ILIKEIT, but there is no more reason to keep this character's article than there is for most pokemon (who probobly have many more sites devoted to them on the 'net).Yobmod (talk) 08:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge rather than delete -- significant character, present in all(?) B#2 eps., and occasionally a plot-axis -- SockpuppetSamuelson (talk) 09:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep'significant enough over a fairly long run for a separate article. DGG (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.