Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nozomi Aso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nozomi Aso

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication that Aso comes anywhere near meeting the notability requirements for pornogrpahic actresses. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable, no sources or any indication of notability in the article. Firkin Flying Fox (talk) 04:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom's accurate analysis. The Japanese-language wiki article is mostly a credit list and makes no real claims of notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the article is basically a stub. Plus she has no major awards nor any other notable presence in the media, so she clearly fails WP:PORNBIO. -- fdewaele, 18 August 2016, 15:32 CET.
delete Epic fails at meeting the GNG Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:49, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP, as having no reliable sources. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 09:25, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearly fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 22:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.