Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now and Later
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. --Coredesat 06:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No real assertion of this candy's notability, and I must say I've never heard of it. Unless notability demonstrated, delete. --Nlu (talk) 16:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Wha? I can get this candy in any store... the article needs some attention, but the subject itself is certainly notable in my opinion. I've lived in the US all my life; perhaps it is only prevalent here? EVula 16:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. When I went down to the States, I see them in the candy store. I'm not very clear on it though, but I think keeping it is good. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites) 16:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable candy with availability (at least) nationwide. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy, strong keep - bad faith nom. AfDs are getting more and more ridiculous everyday. PT (s-s-s-s) 17:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment While I don't agree that this article should be deleted, I don't see any evidence for a bad faith nom. I mean, after all, is is just a brand of candy...Dina 17:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, Agreed... please WP:AGF PT and don't start accusing people of bad faith unless you actually have some sort of evidence that this is the case.--Isotope23 19:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A quick web search verifies the candy is a national brand. Article could use a little clean up, but otherwise no reason to delete. Dugwiki 17:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's hard to know exactly how to assert notability for a candy. Lots of google hits (I found that "now and later" + candy seemed to get the most related hits). Dina 17:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'd never heard of them until I moved to Texas, but they're popular here. In fact, I'm about to open an Apple-flavored one now. Caknuck 18:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, though it tastes like chewing fruity cardboard, it is a widely available candy that has been around for 40+ years.--Isotope23 19:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep go to a movie theater. Danny Lilithborne 21:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As a kid I was always disappointed at how there was no sequence of events as the label promised, then realized it was "Candy now, cavities and fillings later."Edison 23:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.