Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novoland: Eagle Flag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Firm consensus that notability is shown, and that articles created by blocked users but with substantive edits from others users aren't subject to deletion (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Novoland: Eagle Flag

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Philologick: Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For those like me looking for the actual deletion rationale: it appears to be that this is a creation of Boyhoodjams (talk · contribs) using a sockpuppet Lolastarlight (talk · contribs) and others, which per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Reasons for deletion, Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5. Creations by banned or blocked users, and Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion and enforcement is currently the project's policy on blocked sockpuppeteers using sockpuppets to create stuff. Here are the subsequent edits by (apparently) other people. Uncle G (talk) 09:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Aside from any issues with the initial creator of the article, it's a widely distributed mainland Chinese television series and should be considered notable. matt91486 (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - blocked user. Keeping only encourages sockpuppetry.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:07, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - topic is certainly notable, and the blocked user is not the only major contributor. -Zanhe (talk) 03:23, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:44, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep topic is certainly notable. 103.200.134.150 (talk) 10:26, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Zanhe. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.