Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novatech
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as a non-notable company.
- Novatech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The only assertion of notability here is that it is one of the UK's top mail order computer suppliers - and even that is uncited. The only reference is the company's website. I suspect this is a promotional article, but neutrally written so avoiding WP:CSD#G11. Nevertheless the notability of this company seems minimal at best, even if its existence is verifiable. M♠ssing Ace 21:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Rewrite if properly sourced Current version seems promotional, however I suspect from news ghits at news.google.co.uk that this company may indeed be notable. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 21:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 21:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable company, little significant coverage. One single 'news' article that reads suspiciously like a press release. --neon white talk 21:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a notable computer supplier with 100 employees ? Far too small a company to be notable and web searching through news archives backs this up - Peripitus (Talk) 12:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep if the company is indeed worth £46 million ($92 million) it may indicate that it is mildly notable. More (and better) references are needed to keep the article. TubularWorld (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and improve, the company is notable. Kind regards, Ryttaren (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.