Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Novable[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Start up that's been trading for a few months. Some comment in the press, but looks mainly like reworked press releases. Not notable enough (and spam like) QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Novable is a fast rising startup that made some good press in the Belgian and Brussels papers that I'm following. The article on this compagny is purly factual and it's in no case spam or promotion. The source are really reliable (L'echo and La libre are major papers and business papers in Belgium) --Xof2328 (talk) 08:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Factual does not mean notable. The comments in the press look like passing references, re-prints of press releases and other non-journalistic content. QuiteUnusual (talk) 17:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems a Chequebook journalism. Fails WP:ORGIND Mehmood.Husain (talk) 11:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article describing a start-up proposition, sourced to typical announcement-driven coverage of their funding and that they already have clients. Such coverage falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 18:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.