Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nourhaghighi (2 nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, WP:SNOW, WP:IAR. This is never going to hold up.  RasputinAXP  c 11:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Nourhaghighi

Previous version nominated and deleted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nourhaghighi. Can't speedy it as a repost because this is a different long, incoherent rant than the last one. Earlier article was a couple chapters from his autobiography. This is a (slightly) shorter version of his autobiography as an Iranian Army officer under the Shah, followed by a long rant against the Canadian government. (Author's User page has more of the same.) Per closing admin's comment on the last one, "it's hard to find a policy it doesn't contravene in some way." Fails WP:VAIN, WP:AUTO, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, can not be Verified from Reliable Sources, and there's no indication he's really Notable to begin with. Google primarily returns his posting of the same material in various forums, with a few other reports of his lawsuits against the government and his neighbors. Fan-1967 03:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. John254 03:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and protect with extreme prejudice per previous AfD. Still fails WP:BIO and pretty much everything else mentioned in the nom. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Also, someone please check the author's contributions... there's some serious propagandalizing fun going on here, so some housekeeping is definitely needed. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The subject of the article was cited as a source for both current events and the British/American war of 1812 in (vandalized) changes to Toronto (a very long lifespan). User also seems to be making questionable changes to various other articles. --Brat32 04:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with prejudice. Original research at best, family mythology at worst. Just zis Guy you know? 08:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.