Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notsonoisy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Notsonoisy[edit]
- Notsonoisy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sourced by unreliable sources. Doesn't show why the person/company is notable. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Delsort
|
---|
|
- Delete. I'm not seeing any notability here. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:57, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Yup, refs are rubbish. InsertCleverPhraseHere 21:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - These various projects look clever (and may actually be clever), but there's nothing here that passes the notability bar. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 21:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.