Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notorious CHRIS (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:47, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notorious CHRIS[edit]

Notorious CHRIS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG-WP:MUSICBIO. Some coverage, but mostly local in scope. Murgh Krahi (talk) 13:06, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete-- created by SPAs and no indication of satisfying MUSICBIO as iTunes is not a reliable chart. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 15:55, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chart positions mentioned would indicate likely notability but are not supported by sources. Australian newspapers are from different areas but appear to be for local audience in one area, the UK source could be described as local interest but also indicates notability as a musician, some other sources are press releases. There's probably just enough to meet WP:GNG but would have to be checked for accuracy. Peter James (talk) 17:36, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I could not see anything significant in the way of IRS to support GNG. Aoziwe (talk) 12:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.