Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nothin' Fancy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nothin' Fancy

None of the awards cited are notable ones. The only source is a PR piece, and I can't find any other reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Some, possibly most, of the references under "Reviews, articles, notices" are from reliable sources and cover the band in enough depth to demonstrate notability that way. -- Eastmain (talk) 00:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I think they just meet the WP:MUSIC criteria. ~~SIS~~ 00:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I expect the sources have improved since nomination. The BMI award nomination stuck out for me. The article is fairly well written in respect to WP:V WP:NPOV. Since the relm of bluegrass bands (a true genre, and not just Yet-Another-Subgenre) is smaller than more popular styles of music, I don't feel it is as nessisary to strictly adhere to WP:MUSIC. It at least comes close, and it appears to meet the GNG. -Verdatum (talk) 15:43, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, with the current sources I can see at least two pieces of decent, substantial, non-trivial coverage in newspapers, satisfying WP:MUSIC criterion 1. ~ mazca ^{t | c} 22:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.